Diesel engines are considered as a better alternative to
gasoline engines due to fuel economy. Diesel-powered vehicles have demonstrated
a 30 to 40% fuel economy advantage over its gasoline-powered counterparts. At
the same time, diesel is preferred over gasoline due to the 20% reduction in
carbon dioxide emissions; however diesel engines have their drawbacks with the
significant emissions of particulate matter and nitrogen oxide which are
considered hazardous pollutants. Technology on the other hand has endeavored to
create a solution to minimize these emissions through selective catalytic reduction of NOX, which is both a cost effective and fuel efficient solution.
What is selective
catalytic reduction of NOX?
Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is an exhaust
after-treatment for the control of NOX emissions downstream from the diesel
engine. SCR takes place after the combustion process and utilizes diesel
exhaust fluid (DEF) to reduce nitrogen oxide levels. DEF is injected into the
exhaust stream to react with NOX in the SCR catalyst to form harmless nitrogen
and water vapor. In order to achieve extremely low levels of NOX emissions
required by EPA 2010, most machine manufacturers uses both SCR and EGR and
applies the advantages of both technologies to reduce hazardous emissions and
provide better engine performance.
What is EGR
technology?
Exhaust gas recirculation works by cooling exhaust gas and
recycling it back through the engine. This reduces the amount of oxygen
available for combustion which in turn reduces the combustion temperature in
the cylinder. A cooler combustion reduces NOX emissions however; the lower
temperature diesel combustion creates more particulate matter and burns more
fuel. The costs of in-cylinder EGR involves additional vehicle cooling and air
handling system with potential for additional turbo charging capability and
decreased engine life. There is a significant loss of performance for engines
using in-cylinder EGR by as much as 50 to 100% horsepower depending on the
platform. It will also take a larger displacement in-cylinder EGR engine to do
the same job as an SCR engine.
Why selective
catalytic reduction of NOX is is highly considered by the trucking industry
SCR is cost effective
The costs are associated with compliance to EPA standards no
matter what solution is taken. The initial investment on the selective
catalytic reduction of NOX will be recovered over the life of the vehicle in
terms of fuel economy, improved reliability, and improved regeneration cycles
not to mention less downtime and maintenance costs.
SCR has fewer
regeneration cycles
SCR will have fewer regeneration cycles with less manual
stationary regenerations required. Improved regeneration rates means less fuel
burned and more time on the road
SCR requires minimal
maintenance
With selective catalytic reduction of NOX, engine
maintenance intervals remain the same with one service point added, the DEF
filter which should be changed every 200,000 miles. With SCR there are no
issues over driver training and understanding of how a DEF gauge works and how
to fill a tank. With SCR, engine components last longer because there is less
heat generated and fewer contaminants. The overall result is a longer engine
life.
No comments:
Post a Comment